From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: again on index usage
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 11:29:32 -0800
Message-ID: <3C3F3D1C.6040307@pacifier.com> (raw)
References: <200201111824.g0BIOKY26496@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I have always felt some feedback mechanism from the executor back to the
> optimizer was required but I was never sure quite how to implement it.
The folks at DEC (rdb???) wrote a paper on it a long time ago (duh, back
when DEC existed). I ran across it in the Tuft's library about a year
ago, back when my girlfriend was in grad school.
--
Don Baccus
Portland, OR
http://donb.photo.net, http://birdnotes.net, http://openacs.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: dhogaza@pacifier.com, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, daniel@digsys.bg, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, ZeugswetterA@spardat.at
Subject: Re: again on index usage
In-Reply-To: <3C3F3D1C.6040307@pacifier.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox