From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:47:20 +0900
Message-ID: <3C58BE48.AD4EE527@tpf.co.jp> (raw)
References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0201290939350.24201-100000@vespasia.home-net.internetconnect.net>
<3C573C5E.F01B48C2@tpf.co.jp>
<27527.1012432386@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<3C58A472.2E90C21C@tpf.co.jp>
<29268.1012444330@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
>
> > BTW I see few references to *catalog*. Would the concept
> > of catalog be introduced together. If so what would be
> > contained in the current database.
>
> My thought is that we will consider catalog == database. As far as
> I can tell, that is a legitimate implementation-defined way of
> interpreting the spec. (It's not clear to me what the value is of
> having more than one level of schema hierarchy; or at least, if you want
> hierarchical namespaces, there's no argument for stopping at depth two.
> But I digress.) To satisfy the spec we must allow a (purely decorative)
> specification of the current database name as the catalog level of a
> qualified name, but that's as far as I want to go. In this round,
> anyway. Cross-database access is not something to tackle for 7.3.
Just a confirmation.
We can't see any catalog.schema.object notation in 7.3,
can we ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Inoue@tpf.co.jp, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, wrstuden@netbsd.org, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
In-Reply-To: <3C58BE48.AD4EE527@tpf.co.jp>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox