From: Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:32:44 -0700
Message-ID: <3D6325FC.8020608@joeconway.com> (raw)
References: <18530.1029866880@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1029867570.99470.82.camel@jester>
<19248.1029868284@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason I bring this up is that if we are changing the internal
> representation of arrays, we could add type OID and perhaps typmod to
> the array header, thus making an array value interpretable without any
> outside info. Then you could actually do something interesting with
> a function taking anyarraytype.
This sounds very cool. I'd vote for that.
Joe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: mail@joeconway.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, rbt@zort.ca
Subject: Re: Proposal: make "opaque" obsolete
In-Reply-To: <3D6325FC.8020608@joeconway.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox