pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Hot Backup
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 18:28:01 +0530
Message-ID: <3DA323B1.3732.155CAB4F@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f83feacee1d351df62199be3df8ea6af3da2cdd3@>

On 8 Oct 2002 at 14:17, Erwan DUROSELLE wrote:

> 
> MvO> http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?wal.html 
> - The URL you refer to is the ch11 I was refering to. It seems that this chapter is not as easily understandable as it should...
> It says that with WAL, "pg is able to garantee consistency in the case of a crash".
> OK, but I think  is about /consistency/.
> For what I understand, it just says that in the case of a core dump of a server process (improbable) or a power cut (probable) or an unwanted kill -9 (may happen), Pg will not have any corrupted table or index. 
> 
> Cool, but not enough.
> 
> As Timur pointed out, I was refering to a disk crash or total loss of a server.
> In this case, you loose up to 1 day of data.
> > There is a need in "incremental" backup, which backs up only those
> > transactions which has been fulfilled after last "full dump" or last
> > "incremental dump".  These backups should be done quite painlessly -
> > just copy some part of WAL, and should be small enough (compared to
> > full dump), so they can be done each hour or even more frequently..
> > 
> > I hope sometime PostgreSQL will support that. :-)

Well, there are replication solutions which rsyncs WAL files after they are 
rotated so two database instances are upto sync with each other at a difference 
of one WAL file. If you are interested I can post the pdf.

I guess that takes care of scenario you plan to avoid..

Bye
 Shridhar

--
Truthful, adj.:	Dumb and illiterate.		-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's 
Dictionary"




view thread (18+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <3DA323B1.3732.155CAB4F@localhost>
Permalink:  ../3DA323B1.3732.155CAB4F@localhost/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/3DA323B1.3732.155CAB4F@localhost

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: Hot Backup
  In-Reply-To: <3DA323B1.3732.155CAB4F@localhost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox