From: Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 16:41:28 -0700
Message-ID: <3E9B4728.7945BD2F@cvc.net> (raw)
References: <200304142237.h3EMbvv13720@candle.pha.pa.us>
With the feature set that Postgres has, it isn't going to lose momentum.
It is lacking in some areas that are slowly being addressed.
If they weren't being addressed, THEN, postgres would lose momentum.
We're fortunate to have good volunteers and the private donations of
companies as well.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Several people have asked if we are losing momentum. Specifically, they
> are concerned about Red Hat dropping their Red Hat Database and instead
> distributing PostgreSQL as part of Red Hat Enterprise Server, and they
> are concerned about recent press articles about MySQL.
>
> Let me address these. First, the Red Hat change probably has a lot to
> do with Oracle's relationship with Red Hat, and very little to do with
> PostgreSQL. Their pullback is similar to Great Bridge's closing, except
> that Red Hat's database group is still around, so we aren't losing Tom
> Lane or Patrick MacDonald (who is completing our PITR work for 7.4).
>
> As far as MySQL, they have a company to push articles to the press, and
> many writers just dress them up and print them --- you can tell them
> because the pushed ones mention only MySQL, while the non=pushed ones
> mention MySQL and PostgreSQL.
>
> I have been around the globe enough to know that PostgreSQL is well on
> track. Our user base is growing, we have Win32 and PITR ready for 7.4
> (and each had some commercial funding to make them happen.) Recently, I
> have also been fielding questions from several companies that want to
> hire PostgreSQL developers to work for the community.
>
> But most importantly, there is mind share. I get _very_ few questions
> about MySQL anymore, and when the database topic comes up on Slashdot,
> the MySQL guys usually end up looking foolish for using MySQL. And my
> recent trip to Toronto (who's details I have shared with core but can
> not discuss) left no doubt in my mind that PostgreSQL is moving forward
> at a rapid rate.
>
> And, I have 1.5k emails to read after a one week trip. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: gearond@cvc.net, pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
In-Reply-To: <3E9B4728.7945BD2F@cvc.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox