public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
To: Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Fujii Masao <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Treat <[email protected]>
Cc: Pg Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:07:04 +0200
Message-ID: <40729.1755799624@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADzfLwW=b=U3e6aasi=XorN8hZSiCKZErKs9qhyK7m=w=wokAg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADzfLwXx46j8KwQjjM1ZcqNBsx-k6GxHOzDJkm4SHjh+cv31Rw@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CADzfLwW=b=U3e6aasi=XorN8hZSiCKZErKs9qhyK7m=w=wokAg@mail.gmail.com>

Mihail Nikalayeu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Also, I think I found an issue (or lost something during rebase): we
> must preserve xmin,cmin during initial copy
> to make sure that data is going to be visible by snapshots of
> concurrent changes later:
> 
> static void
> reform_and_rewrite_tuple(......)
> .....
>       /*It is also crucial to stamp the new record with the exact same
> xid and cid,
>       * because the tuple must be visible to the snapshot of the
> applied concurrent
>       * change later.
>       */
>       CommandId      cid = HeapTupleHeaderGetRawCommandId(tuple->t_data);
>       TransactionId   xid = HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tuple->t_data);
> 
>       heap_insert(NewHeap, copiedTuple, xid, cid, HEAP_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL, NULL);

When posting version 12 of the patch [1] I raised a concern that the the MVCC
safety is too expensive when it comes to logical decoding. Therefore, I
abandoned the concept for now, and v13 [2] uses plain heap_insert(). Once we
implement the MVCC safety, we simply rewrite the tuple like v12 did - that's
the simplest way to preserve fields like xmin, cmin, ...

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/178741.1743514291%40localhost
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/97795.1744363522%40localhost

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com





view thread (106+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
  In-Reply-To: <40729.1755799624@localhost>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox