From: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:50:48 -0400
Message-ID: <41012425-6aa0-e06c-a2f2-e5d17bb686f9@anastigmatix.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANP8+jJw1e6PtVFHSwAidvifbMyG4OhhEN_Z09trAo5ChV7gVw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <VisenaEmail.24.e60072a07f006130.162d95c3e17@tc7-visena>
<20180418155055.gawfkerzvy5rxpxe@alap3.anarazel.de>
<CANP8+jJw1e6PtVFHSwAidvifbMyG4OhhEN_Z09trAo5ChV7gVw@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/18/2018 12:27 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Please change the name of the "JIT" parameter to something meaningful
> to humans before this gets too far into the wild.
>
> SSL is somewhat understandable because its not a Postgres-private term.
JIT is hardly a Postgres-private term. It's a familiar term in a
widespread community, though I might cede the point that the
community in question is more compiler wonks than DBAs.
-Chap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: chap@anastigmatix.net, simon@2ndquadrant.com, andres@anarazel.de, andreas@visena.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Query is over 2x slower with jit=on
In-Reply-To: <41012425-6aa0-e06c-a2f2-e5d17bb686f9@anastigmatix.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox