pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedecpglib major version changed
3+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]
* ecpglib major version changed
@ 2019-09-16 11:14 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2019-09-16 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-hackers
The ecpglib major version (SO_MAJOR_VERSION) was changed in
bd7c95f0c1a38becffceb3ea7234d57167f6d4bf (Add DECLARE STATEMENT support
to ECPG.), but I don't see anything in that patch that would warrant
that. I think we should undo that change.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ecpglib major version changed
@ 2019-09-16 13:41 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
parent: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2019-09-16 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers; Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> The ecpglib major version (SO_MAJOR_VERSION) was changed in
> bd7c95f0c1a38becffceb3ea7234d57167f6d4bf (Add DECLARE STATEMENT support
> to ECPG.), but I don't see anything in that patch that would warrant
> that. I think we should undo that change.
Ouch. Yeah, that's a Big Deal from a packaging standpoint.
Why would it be necessary?
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: ecpglib major version changed
@ 2019-09-19 07:37 Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
parent: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Eisentraut @ 2019-09-19 07:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: pgsql-hackers; Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>
On 2019-09-16 15:41, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> The ecpglib major version (SO_MAJOR_VERSION) was changed in
>> bd7c95f0c1a38becffceb3ea7234d57167f6d4bf (Add DECLARE STATEMENT support
>> to ECPG.), but I don't see anything in that patch that would warrant
>> that. I think we should undo that change.
>
> Ouch. Yeah, that's a Big Deal from a packaging standpoint.
> Why would it be necessary?
I double-checked this with abidiff and there was nothing changed except
a few added functions. So I've reverted it now.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-09-19 07:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-09-16 11:14 ecpglib major version changed Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
2019-09-16 13:41 ` Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2019-09-19 07:37 ` Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox