From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:14:58 +0200
Message-ID: <4A37E122.8070303@pjmodos.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Anyway back to my thoughts about this patch. First of all I see problem
> with the proposed syntax. For this syntax I think TABLES (FUNCTIONS,
> SEQUENCES, etc) would have to be added to keywords which is problematic
> because there are views named tables, sequences, views in
> information_schema so we can't really make them keywords. I have no idea
> how to get around this and I don't see good alternative syntax either.
> This is main and only real problem I have.
Erm, seems like the problem was just me overlooking something in gram.y
(I forgot to add those keywords to unreserved_keyword) so no real
problems, but I'd still like to hear answers to those other questions in
my previous email.
--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pjmodos@pjmodos.net
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
In-Reply-To: <4A37E122.8070303@pjmodos.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox