pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:24:35 -0800
Message-ID: <4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTima4qDDgN6jZkRhm7pqp0f7W2pSKL=p_e+tBhmm@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1295127631.3282.100.camel@ebony>
	<4D397FE4.2020709@enterprisedb.com>
	<1295616270.1803.10799.camel@ebony>
	<4D39A761.1020105@enterprisedb.com>
	<1295629194.1803.11957.camel@ebony>
	<AANLkTinFTZjur8gP+35eDKPGBjFRbdPmCTHT87e8r4mx@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikDK-1v6FfKGMA2j9VTPjnoC4ie_+c9dR2yHS3-@mail.gmail.com>
	<14761.1295633002@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTi=s4dHGt0my6QQ2oduhdyti8++bp4-_=Pxhzn7Z@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikG8WMhOocX9AYsRHYPc-PgxPaG6miFDD9QH3i1@mail.gmail.com>
	<1295703074.1803.19835.camel@ebony>
	<AANLkTimcwkbmL9qxiWRsCRA0CoFt5_ePE97CapF7xiw7@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimbcoPDUgZaX743ptg2e=99-zLgpVzjWWRvZoV8@mail.gmail.com>
	<1297096419.1770.5824.camel@ebony>
	<AANLkTikLyNAPoFmiQwT4pFj_sLtji1U=Bmc+dqKUVOnv@mail.gmail.com>
	<21347.1297100595@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<AANLkTimX4DUMp5SmMGYMdmT_YwncLzJHpzJ+FbaDGAyW@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2d3n3veyo.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr>
	<AANLkTima4qDDgN6jZkRhm7pqp0f7W2pSKL=p_e+tBhmm@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/7/11 11:41 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> However, I don't want to prolong
> the CommitFest indefinitely in the face of patches that the authors
> are not actively working on or can't finish in the time available, or
> where there is no consensus that the proposed change is what we want.
> I believe that this, too, is a generally accepted principle in our
> community, not something I just made up.

+1.

I, for one, would vote against extending beta if Sync Rep isn't ready
yet.  There's plenty of other "big features" in 9.1, and Sync Rep will
benefit from having additional development time given the number of
major spec points we only cleared up a few weeks ago.

I think the majority of our users would prefer a 9.1 in May to one that
has Sync Rep and is delivered in September.  If they had a choice.

Speaking of which, time to do some reviewing ...

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com



view thread (89+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com
  Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
  In-Reply-To: <4D505503.2000508@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox