pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:53:55 +0300
Message-ID: <4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAPpHfdv=V+UGFyq=EJeLUzxygN3m63H0yocX4jsAmEBha7NKRw@mail.gmail.com >
References: <BANLkTikgOQ1+r=A9b08szNTeEWsk-cNMMg@mail.gmail.com >
<BANLkTinN6C8q61Fb8ASZVOPbYq7VoqoHOw@mail.gmail.com >
<BANLkTin=gyX5PJW-JaN59uqRBSgdDHVNNA@mail.gmail.com >
<BANLkTikSbaun6Sf8hJSkO0D4nu7VC2O35A@mail.gmail.com >
<4E044D68.5070605@enterprisedb.com >
<BANLkTi=umLx8LBCSmALKpoGTFguqQxQ61w@mail.gmail.com >
<BANLkTinK-ZL-yQCNtKZLfGS=8VGmO13b8g@mail.gmail.com >
<4E0894FF.8080202@enterprisedb.com >
<BANLkTi=1TL+pH2sxiR7nf3oMFdWAHHgSyA@mail.gmail.com >
<CAPpHfdt6ER8LKEEmnVnbYuaODKpDb4S5UuGRa5prio--Kp=LFw@mail.gmail.com >
<26338.1310134685@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CAPpHfduE1LM7aCk7MZ_u_n2z58Jxps=TBD0eX4WX4gwBrkk=Yw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAPpHfdvcAo2L2RVtnr+BtPE18Q4mJLaLf-R7SrKMTUousv8ChA@mail.gmail.com >
<4E1DA4CB.9020209@enterprisedb.com >
<CAPpHfdvSC3p7zR_BwbNhm+3fvg8b-rwe+p=HJ9Gii8_rethbuw@mail.gmail.com >
<4E1EABD9.5000308@enterprisedb.com >
<CAPpHfdsO3BBEXzBwcrVGHXE=dYUOhQ+corT3gLLtCkjNXacHoQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CAPpHfdv=V+UGFyq=EJeLUzxygN3m63H0yocX4jsAmEBha7NKRw@mail.gmail.com >
On 14.07.2011 23:41, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Do you think using "rightlink" as pointer to parent page is possible during
> index build? It would allow to simplify code significantly, because of no
> more need to maintain in-memory structures for parents memorizing.
I guess, but where do you store the rightlink, then? Would you need a
final pass through the index to fix all the rightlinks?
I think you could use the NSN field. It's used to detect concurrent page
splits, but those can't happen during index build, so you don't need
that field during index build. You just have to make it look like an
otherwise illegal NSN, so that it won't be mistaken for a real NSN after
the index is built. Maybe add a new flag to mean that the NSN is
actually invalid.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (114+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink: ../4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, aekorotkov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build
In-Reply-To: <4E1F5763.9090109@enterprisedb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox