From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:30:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4E721A30.1040404@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6yO=066NxvXn40+5jUwY_wPHkQuY0fFfbjbYfRrdhCY4_dZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4E71B4C4.3010004@gmail.com>
<CAF6yO=066NxvXn40+5jUwY_wPHkQuY0fFfbjbYfRrdhCY4_dZw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2011-09-15 16:31, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> There exist also a mecanism to order the parameters of 'EXECUTE ...
> USING ...' (it's using a cursor), can the current work benefit to
> EXECUTE USING to use named parameters ?
I looked at it a bit but it seems there is no benefit, since the dynamic
sql handling vs the cursor declaration and opening touch different code
paths in both the plpgsql grammar and the SPI functions that are called.
regards,
Yeb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: yebhavinga@gmail.com, cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Patch for cursor calling with named parameters
In-Reply-To: <4E721A30.1040404@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox