public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Alexander Lakhin <[email protected]>
To: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
To: Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:00:01 +0300
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1+Qg79oR0LknxC05DvWfh_eiyh7eO3sDOiuVsu_dCUDHA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4eK1LGmZsevrqJra0V4O8oBU_eKyzm2VMpSAYQaDgC6n4fkA@mail.gmail.com>
<OS3PR01MB5718AE486227CE3ACB844C5E94F89@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFiTN-sgQ-K9BnMWKLR7Hm36QNjS7ZOBF6hsXJmQz5ChC0Desw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1+P9WOFBupaTZCzYtranSH=8TSUYV=kk5xQJ-VNKnvgmQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB571685A645E509267AC5F30894F99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<OS0PR01MB57168A5A1C31BC316CB63D3C94F99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1KK7Xty7SaCReY_b5moPURowMGOsfvhOb6xQ1EAaJAh6A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoDDbM8_HJt-nMCvcjTK8K9hPzXWqJj7pyaUvR4mm_NrSg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1K4zjeCmZUX_L09-VhjMxfqcCa+OMmpHre7YWTY2Tgxsw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoDD_P+6SCfQ2Nc79k=WwgDMyzMXzMVfhSEiGPyvYJ4H_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<OS0PR01MB57164DF9FC5366024A1952D594659@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1+Qg79oR0LknxC05DvWfh_eiyh7eO3sDOiuVsu_dCUDHA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Amit and Zhijie,
28.04.2023 05:51, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 4:11 PM Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think the problem is that it tried to release locks in
>> logicalrep_worker_onexit() before the initialization of the process is complete
>> because this callback function was registered before the init phase. So I think we
>> can add a conditional statement before releasing locks. Please find an attached
>> patch.
> Alexander, does the proposed patch fix the problem you are facing?
> Sawada-San, and others, do you see any better way to fix it than what
> has been proposed?
Yes, the patch definitely fixes it.
Maybe some other onexit actions can be skipped in the non-normal mode,
but the assert-triggering LockReleaseAll() not called now.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Alexander
view thread (105+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox