pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:37:47 -0400
Message-ID: <521D1C2B.8090503@2ndQuadrant.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CADyhKSWw1RY01tyuhRzu2HAa_+B9Z5qS6Jv+HEA1w0C9Ua2QLQ@mail.gmail.com >
References: <CADyhKSUq+BHPAEdrNQXy_bFSzz2SG29vzJmDUh4p20iWje8QSg@mail.gmail.com >
<CADyhKSVNMMvmPCQkpaVb96T4F3Eu+uREnak4_5_5RLOuSeJLQg@mail.gmail.com >
<CADyhKSXFzQBXQoNwiKdN9xxoVw7Zqz9gmF64Sry57QKduSFwSQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CANPAkgtgZbOE5-iU17Gy+_YWODe5UBsfZg6+rk2v=bNQRo0wgA@mail.gmail.com >
<CADyhKSVoCHMnnGX0Z2b8dgfCUoE1XGdtbAz2HXE4+Q3ajgoxrQ@mail.gmail.com >
<CANPAkgvcL+w2scZqEcXwX5-TMe9EEORLcHDesJeTn8yoZsc0=g@mail.gmail.com >
<51E880CF.3000902@gmail.com >
<51E8A8C1.2050700@2ndQuadrant.com >
<20130719030347.GV15510@tamriel.snowman.net >
<51E8ADD9.5020600@2ndQuadrant.com >
<CAEZATCXdj4E8uPHxq7jiE=1gGVB0xyeHtE8wUjHoX385sHhx4Q@mail.gmail.com >
<CADyhKSWw1RY01tyuhRzu2HAa_+B9Z5qS6Jv+HEA1w0C9Ua2QLQ@mail.gmail.com >
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 7/20/13 10:08 AM, Kohei KaiGai wrote:
> Hmm. I didn't have this idea. It seems to me fair enough and kills
> necessity to enhance RangeTblEntry and getrelid() indeed.
> I try to fix up this implementation according to your suggestion.
How is that going? I'm going to do a serious review of this myself over
the next few weeks. I have a good chunk of time set aside for it as
part of a larger project. I'm hoping to get more people here involved
in that effort too, starting in the November CF if that works out.
I've been trying to catch up with your larger plan for this feature for
9.4. You made this comment earlier:
> Also, I'd like to have discussion for this feature in earlier half of
> v9.4 to keep time for the remaining features, such as check on
> writer-side, integration with selinux, and so on
Is any of that code around yet? I see that you have split your
submissions so that a smaller program can be reviewed today. I'd like
to start taking a look at the next step too though. For the project I'm
starting to work on here, getting the integration with labeling also
done is a very important thing to target for 9.4. It would be nice to
see how that fits together today, even if the code for it isn't being
reviewed heavily yet.
I don't quite understand yet what's missing on the writer side. If you
could help explain what's missing there, I would like to read about that.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (165+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <521D1C2B.8090503@2ndQuadrant.com>
Permalink: ../521D1C2B.8090503@2ndQuadrant.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/521D1C2B.8090503@2ndQuadrant.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: greg@2ndQuadrant.com, kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp
Subject: Re: [v9.4] row level security
In-Reply-To: <521D1C2B.8090503@2ndQuadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox