pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: shigeru.hanada@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:33:32 +0900
Message-ID: <5307014C.4070605@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140221.152321.92712524.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20140220.154736.15628889.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<5305DF28.1010308@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<5306BC08.2000009@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<20140221.152321.92712524.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

(2014/02/21 15:23), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>>>> NOTICE: Child foregn table child01 is affected.
>>>> NOTICE: Child foregn table child02 is affected
>>>> NOTICE: Child foregn table child03 rejected 'alter tempmin set
>>>> default'
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about this? It looks a bit too loud for me
>>>> though...
>>>
>>> I think that's a good idea.
>>
>> I just thought those messages would be shown for the user to readily
>> notice the changes of the structures of child tables that are foreign,
>> done by the recursive altering operation.  But I overlooked the third
>> line:
>>
>> NOTICE: Child foregn table child03 rejected 'alter tempmin set
>> default'
>>
>> What does "rejected" in this message mean?
>
> It says that child03 had no ability to perform the requested
> action, in this case setting a default value. It might be better
> to reject ALTER on the parent as a whole when any children
> doesn't accept any action.

Now understood, thougn I'm not sure it's worth implementing such a 
checking mechanism in the recursive altering operation...

Thanks,

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (179+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5307014C.4070605@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Permalink:  ../5307014C.4070605@lab.ntt.co.jp/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5307014C.4070605@lab.ntt.co.jp

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, shigeru.hanada@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: inherit support for foreign tables
  In-Reply-To: <5307014C.4070605@lab.ntt.co.jp>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox