public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
To: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
To: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 09:17:28 +0100
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHut+PuHhrBrYQ2cWkRuAuN6S1mAo0iEsnJSHcfOXazkF8xE8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHut+Pv8Oa7v06hJb3+HzCtM2u-3oHWMdvXVHhvi7ofB83pNbg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+Pv=tk6u2MbvqfSdD74HRKpV2QP+e=p0X=g7t6Bf23531w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYtjTbYUs+bLUCk7aszXq_rHx0Fj=0e0fiaVKyDZ9k0Yw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvkAp4AS03U08uPWjOoAY+zxD1j43xhRH0TUqzuOMx2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwa9JtoCBVc6CJb7NC5FqMeEAy_A8X4H8t6kVaw7fz9LTw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+Pv5Efz1TLWOLSoFvoyC0mq+s92yFSd534ctWSdjEFtKCw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYkM5UZT+6tG+NgZvDcd5VavS+xNHsGsWC8jS-KJsxh7w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvUdTdK5UGMXkm_U+1Cdez9y6x057GTrb3XSChybjdS3w@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAKFQuwbQHgBJ4zSA_oKfO6qKvy3S16hx0HuMQGpxmm53MEQJqg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PvYpLyEGrw=6gnakU7xNfAWHeNKqFbcDghfSjOdDutTjQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwYUCsugVg5cOgezh52W_2MwqMewXkr79DnxUVJ3Cs2dvA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKFQuwby7xWHek8=6UPaNXrhGA-i0B2zMOmBoGHgc4yaO8NH_w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHut+PuHhrBrYQ2cWkRuAuN6S1mAo0iEsnJSHcfOXazkF8xE8g@mail.gmail.com>
On 08.12.22 03:30, Peter Smith wrote:
> PSA patches for v9*
>
> v9-0001 - Now the table rows are ordered per PeterE's suggestions [1]
committed
> v9-0002 - All the review comments from DavidJ [2] are addressed
I'm not sure about this one. It removes the "see [link] for details"
phrases and instead makes the view name a link. I think this loses the
cue that there is more information elsewhere. Otherwise, one could
think that, say, the entry about pg_stat_activity is the primary source
and the link just links to itself. Also keep in mind that people use
media where links are not that apparent (PDF), so the presence of a link
by itself cannot be the only cue about the flow of the information.
view thread (2+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox