pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 11:30:36 -0800
Message-ID: <5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WM!ad346fe436553241958b84709fedb3e37641900b0cac6b41749730692f2c7f07efbeff3279f89ff96d4e2f36a9635bda!@asav-2.01.com>
References: <CAA4eK1LcDLmOfw3Y4L9FeAn+pMcLg6OLSTK45G9SBQUvO4tZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20141213020946.GG1768@alvh.no-ip.org>
	<001601d0180c$a212f550$e638dff0$@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+TgmoaA18DL8SG51tDQ=wjQBAqb658cR1TSV3diLmk_x9iRzQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<WM!8cffd9c1cee9a4329fc6359e77402db760b5f8d1643541d65e3238e233ee747cb8155136b36d574ace2fb276dac2a8b2!@asav-3.01.com>
	<54907DD9.7060306@agliodbs.com>
	<CA+TgmobPx8NTOES2SRd2EfpzoiXaR2FXYNUP9RKwNUEyu+Y0sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<WM!b18eb67c4aa52f89deaf07f899a368eb286454c2a91eb4369b34119763798b42effdcbeaebf0622b348e80940cb98ea5!@asav-2.01.com>
	<5490E3EB.8020904@agliodbs.com>
	<CA+TgmoYuRLE-H1c2sXh8KNnHca71FWg6w4N0Wg8Zvvp0m6_NHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<WM!0c7452d446aeb98de62b09db01b6641c65153d67054de7343c705e707a38ac8b8dd4a50803017aa247bf7a054638bdf8!@asav-2.01.com>
	<5491D10E.7040208@agliodbs.com>
	<5491D732.5050409@vmware.com>
	<WM!ad346fe436553241958b84709fedb3e37641900b0cac6b41749730692f2c7f07efbeff3279f89ff96d4e2f36a9635bda!@asav-2.01.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On 12/17/2014 11:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 12/17/2014 08:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Last week, I wrote a longish email listing out the common problems users
>> have with our current partitioning as a way of benchmarking the plan for
>> new partitioning.  While some people responded to that post, absolutely
>> nobody discussed the list of issues I gave.  Is that because there's
>> universal agreement that I got the major issues right?  Seems doubtful.
> 
> That was a good list.

;-)

Ok, that made my morning.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (169+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com>
Permalink:  ../5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: josh@agliodbs.com, hlinnakangas@vmware.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, klaussfreire@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
  Subject: Re: On partitioning
  In-Reply-To: <5491D9DC.2000507@agliodbs.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox