From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
To: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 21:50:35 -0400
Message-ID: <5567C5EB.3070703@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150528193556.GH26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <55674016.80005@commandprompt.com>
<20150528193556.GH26667@tamriel.snowman.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 5/28/15 3:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar,
> and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into
> it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib
> if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we
> would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which
> are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory.
This seems reasonable to me. It's in line with the recent move from
contrib to bin. It'll just be quite a bit bigger of an undertaking.
(50 threads to discuss the merits of each module separately?) Maybe
start by picking the top 5 and sort those out.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter_e@gmx.net, sfrost@snowman.net, jd@commandprompt.com
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
In-Reply-To: <5567C5EB.3070703@gmx.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox