pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Covering + unique indexes.
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:57:53 +0300
Message-ID: <55F718B1.8030306@sigaev.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEepm=2G4jdaoXHU0PJ7MqLms88==r44z9bvLpnzjyOTDzwAEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55F2C1BC.3010109@postgrespro.ru>
	<55F2CCD0.7040608@postgrespro.ru>
	<55F6F7AD.4080307@BlueTreble.com>
	<55F70D0A.2030503@sigaev.ru>
	<CAEepm=2G4jdaoXHU0PJ7MqLms88==r44z9bvLpnzjyOTDzwAEw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

> It surprised me that you can INCLUDE extra columns on non-UNIQUE
> indexes, since you could just add them as regular indexed columns for
> the same effect.  It looks like when you do that in SQL Server, the
> extra columns are only stored on btree leaf pages and so can't be used
> for searching or ordering.  I don't know how useful that is or if we
> would ever want it... but I just wanted to note that difference, and
Agree

> that the proposed UNIQUE ON FIRST n COLUMNS syntax and catalog change
> can't express that.
  Proposal suggests to work only with unique index by exactly your 
reasons above.


-- 
Teodor Sigaev                      E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                       WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (35+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <55F718B1.8030306@sigaev.ru>
Permalink:  ../55F718B1.8030306@sigaev.ru/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/55F718B1.8030306@sigaev.ru

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: teodor@sigaev.ru, thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com, Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com, a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru
  Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Covering + unique indexes.
  In-Reply-To: <55F718B1.8030306@sigaev.ru>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox