From: Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:20:27 -0600
Message-ID: <568EBA7B.6030801@BlueTreble.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160107190421.GA448981@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20160107190421.GA448981@alvherre.pgsql>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 1/7/16 1:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>
>> Also worth noting: the only reason I'm using pg_regress is it's the easiest
>> way to get a test cluster. If not for that, I'd just use pg_prove since I'm
>> already using pgTap.
>
> In 9.5 you might want to "use PostgresNode" which allows you to initdb
> and such.
Oooh, thanks! I might well just copy that into my pgxntool utility.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Very confusing installcheck behavior with PGXS
In-Reply-To: <568EBA7B.6030801@BlueTreble.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox