pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Ildar Musin <i.musin@postgrespro.ru>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:01:02 +0900
Message-ID: <56D3D08E.4060201@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D3715F.1060102@postgrespro.ru>
References: <55D3093C.5010800@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<56A23484.4000504@2ndquadrant.com>
	<56A9D51E.2000508@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<56C1302D.6070403@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CADkLM=cLntJWEzCjW1LUbnRAYz6+-ZooO0FXKg+7rdkTaVE+2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<56C26D27.40108@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<WM!d6dd475995a24385f07585c1088a8d539ae7cd66bc94bda3302a62148d440ab7c4acfd99eb4215a796034bfbac104bbd!@asav-2.01.com>
	<56C28C4C.5090409@agliodbs.com>
	<56C28D8A.2060608@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<56D3715F.1060102@postgrespro.ru>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>


Hi Ildar,

On 2016/02/29 7:14, Ildar Musin wrote:
> 16/02/16 07:46, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2016/02/16 11:41, Josh berkus wrote:
>>> We're not going to use CE for the new partitioning long-term, are we? This
>>> is just the first version, right?
>> Yes. My approach in previous versions of stuffing major planner changes in
>> with the syntax patch was not quite proper in retrospect. So, I thought
>> I'd propose any major planner (and executor) changes later.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amit
>>
> Hello Amit,
> 
> Thank you for your work. I'm currently working on extension aimed at
> planner optimization for partitioned tables
> (https://github.com/postgrespro/pg_pathman). At this moment I have an
> implementation of binary search for range partitioned tables with basic
> partitioning keys (date, timestamp, integers etc). And I'd like to try to
> combine your syntax and infrastructure with my binary search implementation.
> There likely will be changes in range syntax and partitions cache
> structure based on discussion. So looking forward for your next patch.

Sure, thanks! I will look at your extension as well.

Thanks,
Amit




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (161+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <56D3D08E.4060201@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Permalink:  ../56D3D08E.4060201@lab.ntt.co.jp/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/56D3D08E.4060201@lab.ntt.co.jp

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, i.musin@postgrespro.ru
  Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
  In-Reply-To: <56D3D08E.4060201@lab.ntt.co.jp>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox