From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:41:47 -0400
Message-ID: <56EC13AB.8030407@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoZ8eZQSo539y0i9LKS7MeiK9X8HabgEYVmdi0Kj-6QM0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <56EA8A71.8060107@dunslane.net>
<56EACB8C.1040406@dunslane.net>
<CA+TgmoZ8eZQSo539y0i9LKS7MeiK9X8HabgEYVmdi0Kj-6QM0Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 03/18/2016 09:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> On 03/17/2016 06:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>> Here is a patch to add enum support to btree_gin and btree_gist. I didn't
>>> include distance operations, as I didn't think it terribly important, and
>>> there isn't a simple way to compute it sanely and efficiently, so no KNN
>>> support.
>> This time including the data file for the gist regression tests.
> Are you intending this as a 9.7 submission? Because it's pretty late for 9.6.
>
I guess so. I would certainly find it hard to argue that it should be in
9.6 unless there is a consensus on it.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, robertmhaas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
In-Reply-To: <56EC13AB.8030407@dunslane.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox