pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:23:18 +0900
Message-ID: <56F0AC96.2010303@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoaoZRqk2dr3xonta3o4omKuO4V4niVC2DKKo9VpdMc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55D3093C.5010800@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+TgmoaCtvChjt=xky-P4anEyTWjnUm9xrgo6CpRaN6wPmM7mw@mail.gmail.com>
	<566E6C48.9080500@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+TgmoZZMfcf16YaHuhP1Vk=j8PDFeHCvfj+FJQd+eFhs+7P8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<5678ACBC.8050809@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<5698CE6D.3070907@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+TgmoY9C_XxbngCd9TtbEuwhu+4oHjeHt+QSzs-6bM=oY4f-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<56C55973.80309@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CADkLM=fz4SRiaLggFctOcJegpcjxaWPwCyi6YDwq9Wnceno7=w@mail.gmail.com>
	<56CD6598.4090302@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CADkLM=f1zyL-cV_LK8GpXv=iS_=VbHs8bernUMa+8yHtUXjebQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<56DE2D4B.1040001@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CADkLM=cb7q4TSYQYX4EsMHVK0hjEnBJiA8+XMSSropk2CHwa_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<56DF74F0.7060404@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CAPpHfdut34uqoY1vKgvBhsGZqhR6Nky=_Dxn0un57G_M2CvLTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+HiwqFFH10_ku6z_Ps=H7=pR5cWJk9Bdr9nE08+3F53yTEr9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdu0mGbt9T2Jx04OKJfJQ0zW55BFqmisinRYWd2OaowRWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoaoZRqk2dr3xonta3o4omKuO4V4niVC2DKKo9VpdMc_zQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On 2016/03/22 4:55, Robert Haas wrote:
> So, the last patch on this thread was posted on February 17th, and the
> CF entry was marked Waiting on Author on March 2nd.  Even if we had a
> new patch in hand at this point, I don't think there's any real chance
> of being able to get this done for 9.6; there are too many things left
> to do here in terms of figuring out syntax and scope, and of course
> performance testing.  Moreover, when this goes in, it's going to open
> up lots of opportunities for follow-up optimizations that we surely do
> not have time to follow up on for 9.6.  And, as it is, the patch
> hasn't been updated in over a month and is clearly not in final form
> as it exists today.
> 
> Therefore, I have marked this Returned with Feedback.  I look forward
> to returning to this topic for 9.7, and I'm willing to step up to the
> plate and review this more aggressively at that time, with an eye
> toward committing it when we've got it in good shape.  But I don't
> think there's any way to proceed with it for 9.6.

OK. I agree with the decision.

Actually, I was just about to post a patch set today, but I figure it's
too late for that.  Anyway, I look forward to working on this for 9.7.

Thanks,
Amit




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (161+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <56F0AC96.2010303@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Permalink:  ../56F0AC96.2010303@lab.ntt.co.jp/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/56F0AC96.2010303@lab.ntt.co.jp

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, robertmhaas@gmail.com, a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru, amitlangote09@gmail.com, corey.huinker@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
  In-Reply-To: <56F0AC96.2010303@lab.ntt.co.jp>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox