pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Masao Fujii <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: kleptog@svana.org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:11:12 -0400
Message-ID: <56F1FB40.4060605@pgmasters.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB7nPqRdcnQRLvBsBFKci8Y-a3bYmujpwSSr7if2BO+QXZkVcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB7nPqSGFKUAFqPe5t30jeEA+V9yFMM4yJGa3SnkgY1RHzn7Dg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160311.173259.190313590.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
<CAB7nPqSVm-X1-w9i=U=DCyMxDxzfNT-41pqTSvh0DUmUgi8BQg@mail.gmail.com>
<20160316.110158.196524017.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
<56F17512.6060808@pgmasters.net>
<CAB7nPqRLO7+nHfX9sd15jamRyW6kp+2x096ObT9yXV7N=ecdcQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAB7nPqRdcnQRLvBsBFKci8Y-a3bYmujpwSSr7if2BO+QXZkVcA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 3/22/16 8:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:38 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>>> On 3/15/16 10:01 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, I understand that this is not an issue in a hurry. I'll go to
>>>> another patch that needs review.
>>>
>>> Since we're getting towards the end of the CF is it time to pick this up
>>> again?
>>
>> Perhaps not. This is a legit bug with an unfinished patch (see index
>> relation truncation) that is going to need a careful review. I don't
>> think that this should be impacted by the 4/8 feature freeze, so we
>> could still work on that after the embargo and we've had this bug for
>> months actually. FWIW, I am still planning to work on it once the CF
>> is done, in order to keep my manpower focused on actual patch reviews
>> as much as possible...
>
> In short, we may want to bump that to next CF... I have already marked
> this ticket as something to work on soonish on my side, so it does not
> change much seen from here if it's part of the next CF. What we should
> just be sure is not to lose track of its existence.
I would prefer not to bump it to the next CF unless we decide this will
not get fixed for 9.6.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (244+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <56F1FB40.4060605@pgmasters.net>
Permalink: ../56F1FB40.4060605@pgmasters.net/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/56F1FB40.4060605@pgmasters.net
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: david@pgmasters.net, michael.paquier@gmail.com, horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp, hlinnaka@iki.fi, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andres@anarazel.de, masao.fujii@gmail.com
Subject: Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
In-Reply-To: <56F1FB40.4060605@pgmasters.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox