From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Matt Wilmas <pgsql_lists@realplain.com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:55:24 -0400
Message-ID: <56F5899C.7060808@dunslane.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <95B821E794D949A4B389C6A3F2F7AF16@pc1>
References: <56EA8A71.8060107@dunslane.net>
<95B821E794D949A4B389C6A3F2F7AF16@pc1>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 03/24/2016 12:40 PM, Matt Wilmas wrote:
> (I notice the btree_gin docs don't mention "numeric," but it works.)
>
Numeric does work - we have regression tests to prove it, do we should
fix the docs. But I'm also curious to know why apparently we don't have
distance operator support for numeric.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql_lists@realplain.com
Subject: Re: btree_gin and btree_gist for enums
In-Reply-To: <56F5899C.7060808@dunslane.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox