From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
To: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:39:48 -0400
Message-ID: <57042294.70308@pgmasters.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB7nPqRum7n9W-FXM0JDq-SjsveJt9opM36s6OAKhrM4T1WfKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <jlg1tgq1ktm.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
<jlgy48ssyvl.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
<CAB7nPqRum7n9W-FXM0JDq-SjsveJt9opM36s6OAKhrM4T1WfKQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 4/5/16 1:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Btw, those seem like small things to me, and my comments have been
> addressed, so I have switched the patch as ready for committer. I
> guess that Stephen would be the one to look at it.
I have also run this patch through my tests and didn't find any
problems. I agree that it is ready for committer.
I don't see a problem with using the top memory context but whoever
commits it may feel differently. I'm happy to leave that decision up to
them.
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: david@pgmasters.net, michael.paquier@gmail.com, rharwood@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support
In-Reply-To: <57042294.70308@pgmasters.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox