From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:20:12 -0400
Message-ID: <6366.1055287212@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306101925.h5AJPd418238@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200306101925.h5AJPd418238@candle.pha.pa.us>
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> We are 5 days away from the feature freeze date, but with the almost
> week of downtime we have had, I don't think we can stick to that date.
> Do we choose July 1 as feature freeze and July 15 as beta, or push beta
> start to Auguest 1?
I don't think a week of partial downtime justifies a month's slip.
The July 1/15 schedule seems like it might be a good plan though.
I know I'm not going to be done editing error messages by June 15 ...
Any other thoughts out there?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date
In-Reply-To: <6366.1055287212@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox