From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: HEAPDEBUGALL is broken
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:50:27 +0200
Message-ID: <645c0646-4218-d4c3-409a-a7003a0c108d@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
The HEAPDEBUGALL define has been broken since PG12 due to tableam
changes. Should we just remove this? It doesn't look very useful.
It's been around since Postgres95.
If we opt for removing: PG12 added an analogous HEAPAMSLOTDEBUGALL
(which still compiles correctly). Would we want to keep that?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: HEAPDEBUGALL is broken
In-Reply-To: <645c0646-4218-d4c3-409a-a7003a0c108d@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox