pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Tharakan, Robins <tharar@amazon.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: track_planning causing performance regression
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 18:21:41 +0900
Message-ID: <773565c1-6508-063a-8872-20c16d283ee8@oss.nttdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANugjhsdRAJnGjbUeczo1Z82J1WD+jdoWrNvvxmEX4xgdkgZGw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2895b53b033c47ccb22972b589050dd9@EX13D05UWC001.ant.amazon.com>
	<CAOBaU_ZNAjSQEdWK9ERsv6zqhdRqB_C0dVv97BrKETV4Rv7gig@mail.gmail.com>
	<d4a15deb-8a85-b78c-b447-bc5df7c4a926@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAH2-WzmVP4ibDDSipQi_BamMrPeB72X8iW0R-T9gA-ZToG=m9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH2-WznCT6rZYGYE_Zxf1oYDZVMyXqm+SWRx+R2b5-DX11pmpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<42a13b4c-e60c-c6e7-3475-8eff8050bed4@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAH2-WzmYXtaeCtTEmU_37Eiu5AuRM3etinKFKo=posnLtcxe3g@mail.gmail.com>
	<bc8125cb-264e-5a48-7d1f-17b84df831ed@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAFj8pRC9Jxa8r5i0TNBWLb8mzuaYzEoLq3QOvip0jVpHPOLbVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<646e5cae-5e8b-feaa-43dc-014bf355bf08@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAFj8pRC-pfdxNhNGTiAACezYfXdpvKbv9n927rjuj9qkMPCFcA@mail.gmail.com>
	<73b66e99-b4f3-9c4e-3b70-157ddbe81771@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CAFj8pRDT4PDfj69W5TVy-ToWy6gWS+6d9HUxj7G_+F0Rjk2FFA@mail.gmail.com>
	<cb6b6bc4-e853-f552-4934-8ef66dca5960@oss.nttdata.com>
	<CANugjhsdRAJnGjbUeczo1Z82J1WD+jdoWrNvvxmEX4xgdkgZGw@mail.gmail.com>



On 2020/07/31 21:40, Hamid Akhtar wrote:
> <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2634/;
> 
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 10:29 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>     On 2020/07/04 12:22, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > pá 3. 7. 2020 v 13:02 odesílatel Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>> napsal:
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >     On 2020/07/03 16:02, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>      >      >
>      >      >
>      >      > pá 3. 7. 2020 v 8:57 odesílatel Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>>> napsal:
>      >      >
>      >      >
>      >      >
>      >      >     On 2020/07/03 13:05, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>      >      >      > Hi
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      > pá 3. 7. 2020 v 4:39 odesílatel Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>>>> napsal:
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >     On 2020/07/01 7:37, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>      >      >      >      > On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:40 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com <mailto:masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>>>>> wrote:
>      >      >      >      >> Ants and Andres suggested to replace the spinlock used in pgss_store() with
>      >      >      >      >> LWLock. I agreed with them and posted the POC patch doing that. But I think
>      >      >      >      >> the patch is an item for v14. The patch may address the reported performance
>      >      >      >      >> issue, but may cause other performance issues in other workloads. We would
>      >      >      >      >> need to measure how the patch affects the performance in various workloads.
>      >      >      >      >> It seems too late to do that at this stage of v13. Thought?
>      >      >      >      >
>      >      >      >      > I agree that it's too late for v13.
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >     Thanks for the comment!
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >     So I pushed the patch and changed default of track_planning to off.
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      >
>      >      >      > Maybe there can be documented so enabling this option can have a negative impact on performance.
>      >      >
>      >      >     Yes. What about adding either of the followings into the doc?
>      >      >
>      >      >           Enabling this parameter may incur a noticeable performance penalty.
>      >      >
>      >      >     or
>      >      >
>      >      >           Enabling this parameter may incur a noticeable performance penalty,
>      >      >           especially when a fewer kinds of queries are executed on many
>      >      >           concurrent connections.
>      >      >
>      >      >
>      >      > This second variant looks perfect for this case.
>      >
>      >     Ok, so patch attached.
>      >
>      >
>      > +1
> 
>     Thanks for the review! Pushed.
> 
>     Regards,
> 
>     -- 
>     Fujii Masao
>     Advanced Computing Technology Center
>     Research and Development Headquarters
>     NTT DATA CORPORATION
> 
> 
> 
> You might also want to update this patch's status in the commitfest:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/29/2634/

The patch added into this CF entry has not been committed yet.
So I was thinking that there is no need to update the status yet. No?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION





view thread (64+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <773565c1-6508-063a-8872-20c16d283ee8@oss.nttdata.com>
Permalink:  ../773565c1-6508-063a-8872-20c16d283ee8@oss.nttdata.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/773565c1-6508-063a-8872-20c16d283ee8@oss.nttdata.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com, hamid.akhtar@gmail.com, pavel.stehule@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, rjuju123@gmail.com, tharar@amazon.com
  Subject: Re: track_planning causing performance regression
  In-Reply-To: <773565c1-6508-063a-8872-20c16d283ee8@oss.nttdata.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox