From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 19:54:11 -0400
Message-ID: <815268.1593647651@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGK9pfNptAQDNaugsyectUCUk4nsH9EVDBqin+rUdzgEEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1c11f1eb-f00c-43b7-799d-2d44132c02d7@2ndquadrant.com>
<CA+TgmoZ-FXU0iyevFETN0sGYw0RKTSCFxKONGE+2nVJEM5_8OQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGK9pfNptAQDNaugsyectUCUk4nsH9EVDBqin+rUdzgEEw@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 5:58 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> With what other implementations is it compatible?
> Judging by the Wikipedia article[1], it sounds like at least DB2 and
> MySQL/MariaDB are purposely striving for conformance.
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL/PSM
but ... but ... but ... that's about SQL/PSM, which is not this.
Having said that, I wonder whether this work could be repurposed
to be the start of a real SQL/PSM implementation. There's other
stuff in SQL/PSM, but a big part of it is routines that are written
with syntax like this.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.munro@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
In-Reply-To: <815268.1593647651@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox