pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archivehelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: WIP patch for latestCompletedXid method of computing snapshot xmax
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:48:26 +0100
Message-ID: <878x7i0vx1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3018.1189214811@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <3018.1189214811@sss.pgh.pa.us>
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> This patch implements Florian's idea about how to manage snapshot xmax
> without the ugly and performance-losing tactic of taking XidGenLock and
> ProcArrayLock at the same time. I had to do a couple of slightly klugy
> things to get bootstrap and prepared transactions to work, but on the
> whole it seems at least as clean as the code we have now. Comments?
Just that it will be fascinating to see what effects this has on the
benchmarks.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
view thread (17+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <878x7i0vx1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> Permalink: ../878x7i0vx1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com/ Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/878x7i0vx1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com ·
reply
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options: reply via email To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Cc: stark@enterprisedb.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-patches@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: WIP patch for latestCompletedXid method of computing snapshot xmax In-Reply-To: <878x7i0vx1.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com> * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox