From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2026 17:39:54 -0400
Message-ID: <931425.1789076394@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoafHbFwzgKQZn+UgEXHYs_UmC4Wrc5pricG7--di8po6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E15AC050-C4B5-488D-BB2D-3C7AC9F89EA8@yesql.se>
<CA+TgmoaOCdjAjr240e_+xoqQCRmLC9MFn3kZOu-7j8w8HBrd8g@mail.gmail.com>
<927668.1789072635@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<CA+TgmoafHbFwzgKQZn+UgEXHYs_UmC4Wrc5pricG7--di8po6w@mail.gmail.com>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:37 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Don't we have logic somewhere to clean up orphaned relation files?
> Uh ... no?
> I mean, temp tables get cleaned up and unlogged tables get reset to
> empty, but the goal of being able to remove permanent relation files
> instead of permanently leaking them has, to my knowledge, thus far
> eluded us.
You're right, I was thinking of temp-table cleanup.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, daniel@yesql.se, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Trying to break online checksums with LLMs
In-Reply-To: <931425.1789076394@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox