pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>
Cc: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Fedor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
Subject: Re: compress method for spgist - 2
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:14:45 -0400
Message-ID: <9463.1505952885@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPpHfdsAruXqE80v_crv=du4GoUqWgx55gXR05ZAhyRp4kxGBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54907069.1030506@sigaev.ru>
	<CAPpHfdsoy2bJMSTtvQySJ9zN2YJmzWJBLvdHV=ZvMOm6BR0UFg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170920190059.1354.29457.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org>
	<31999.1505938053@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CAPpHfduv0XZ_k+D3NoFMr=wFVM22D=wFZCMMswoLwBe2jAbuJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<60e048d3-aa29-8289-5438-3b0c4c1d8d84@postgrespro.ru>
	<CAC8Q8tJ6jPJd_BJftq9CVrUNTNM__P-H4jbNO9qr5oV=bYJU0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPpHfdsAruXqE80v_crv=du4GoUqWgx55gXR05ZAhyRp4kxGBA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <
> me@komzpa.net> wrote:
>> What is rationale behind this circle?

> I would prefer to rather forbid any geometries with infs and nans.
> However, then upgrade process will suffer.  User with such geometries would
> get errors during dump/restore, pg_upgraded instances would still contain
> invalid values...

Yeah, that ship has sailed unfortunately.

>> It seems to me that any circle with radius of any Infinity should become a
>> [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity] box.Then you won't have
>> NaNs, and index structure shouldn't be broken.

> We probably should produce [-Infinity .. Infinity, -Infinity .. Infinity]
> box for any geometry containing inf or nan.

Hm, we can do better in at least some cases, eg for a box ((0,1),(1,inf))
there's no reason to give up our knowledge of finite bounds for the
other three boundaries.  But certainly for a NaN circle radius
what you suggest seems the most sensible thing to do.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (41+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <9463.1505952885@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../9463.1505952885@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/9463.1505952885@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, aekorotkov@gmail.com, me@komzpa.net, n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru, hlinnaka@iki.fi, teodor@sigaev.ru
  Subject: Re: compress method for spgist - 2
  In-Reply-To: <9463.1505952885@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox