public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Amonson, Paul D <[email protected]>
To: Amonson, Paul D <[email protected]>
To: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: Shankaran, Akash <[email protected]>
Cc: Noah Misch <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:43:39 +0000
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB53043A425DC184F276413504DC282@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR11MB530473FB4E9CBD68C28896F7DC282@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BL1PR11MB5304BFE26BAC25624508CFD2DC232@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20240304222118.GB3367383@nathanxps13>
<BL1PR11MB53047C28DDBA6A2E77B9420ADC222@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20240305163730.GA3479896@nathanxps13>
<BL1PR11MB530444AEE08A91242ABA1915DC222@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20240307173318.GA455851@nathanxps13>
<20240307213600.GA563369@nathanxps13>
<BL1PR11MB5304165E7A81E0107E70B069DC242@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20240312013436.GA1787866@nathanxps13>
<BL1PR11MB53042473B7B53B96E43648A7DC292@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
<20240315150611.GA3495582@nathanxps13>
<BL1PR11MB530473FB4E9CBD68C28896F7DC282@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amonson, Paul D <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 8:31 AM
> To: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
...
> When I tested the code outside postgres in a micro benchmark I got 200-
> 300% improvements. Your results are interesting, as it implies more than
> 300% improvement. Let me do some research on the benchmark you
> referenced. However, in all cases it seems that there is no regression so should
> we move forward on merging while I run some more local tests?
When running quick test with small buffers (1 to 32K) I see up to about a 740% improvement. This was using my stand-alone micro benchmark outside of PG. My original 200-300% numbers were averaged including sizes up to 512MB which seems to not run as well on large buffers. I will try the referenced micro benchmark on Monday. None of my benchmark testing used the command line "time" command. For Postgres is set "\timing" before the run and for the stand-alone benchmark is took timestamps in the code. In all cases I used -O2 for optimization.
Thanks,
Paul
view thread (26+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Popcount optimization using AVX512
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR11MB53043A425DC184F276413504DC282@BL1PR11MB5304.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox