pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luke Lonergan <llonergan@greenplum.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>
Cc: Jie Zhang <jzhang@greenplum.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:55:38 -0700
Message-ID: <C0ED874A.2AFBB%llonergan@greenplum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593.1153923961@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Tom,

On 7/26/06 7:26 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> I wonder
> whether they oughtn't use 16-bit instead of 8-bit HRL_WORDs

We tried variations from 8-bit to 32-bit and came to the conclusion that
8-bit was a better match for the more general case.  For the moment I forget
exactly why (maybe Jie or Ayush will recall).  It's a #define I believe, so
you can play with it to find out.

There's a lot more to be done with this - I think we've got some big gains
ahead.

BTW - lots of excitement here at OSCON about bitmap index, and there's a
fellow who is using the current Bizgres version, but wants *higher*
cardinality support, so I discussed Jie's thoughts about implementing
binning on values, basically combining bit vectors into value bins as the
cardinality increases.

I am still puzzled why our index creation time increases so dramatically as
we approach cardinality 10,000.  I know that we found that index page
traversal for append began to take a lot of time as we started to increase
the number of bitvector pages - we had talked about aggregating the append
operations into groups before they were implemented to sequentialize the
access.

- Luke





view thread (52+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <C0ED874A.2AFBB%llonergan@greenplum.com>
Permalink:  ../C0ED874A.2AFBB%25llonergan@greenplum.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/C0ED874A.2AFBB%llonergan@greenplum.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: llonergan@greenplum.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, markir@paradise.net.nz, josh@agliodbs.com, swm@linuxworld.com.au, jzhang@greenplum.com
  Subject: Re: On-disk bitmap index patch
  In-Reply-To: <C0ED874A.2AFBB%llonergan@greenplum.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox