public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
To: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 09:04:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAA4eK1+s7hyed2ZSwTC42N6VqCV73CGtzBRfcf1qgjCSJbO3Gw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<ZDWLvS1GghESoX/[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 11:50 PM Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2023-04-11 11:33:01 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > I don't know whether others think we should apply it this release, given the
> > > "late submission", but I tend to think it's not worth caring the complication
> > > of vacuum_defer_cleanup_age forward.
> >
> > I don't see any utility in waiting; it just makes the process of
> > removing it take longer for no reason.
> >
> > As long as it's done before the betas, it seems completely reasonable to
> > remove it for v16.
>
> Added the RMT.
>
> We really should have a [email protected] alias...
>
> Updated patch attached. I think we should either apply something like that
> patch, or at least add a <warning/> to the docs.
>

+1 to do one of the above. I think there is a good chance that
somebody might be doing more harm by using it so removing this
shouldn't be a problem. Personally, I have not heard of people using
it but OTOH it is difficult to predict so giving some time is also not
a bad idea.

Do others have any opinion/suggestion on this matter?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

view thread (7+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
  In-Reply-To: <CAA4eK1+s7hyed2ZSwTC42N6VqCV73CGtzBRfcf1qgjCSJbO3Gw@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox