public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Sami Imseih <[email protected]>
To: Pavlo Golub <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add last_executed timestamp to pg_stat_statements
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 17:59:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAA5RZ0tiUbG5RNK-Es+=R9RGpUkCBeJ_WQA5GzpAD3QiDgS3MA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7ymc+Kr7i6p_6Hw_2hEg3xVRH8FYnnrEp0PHg+jeMvqH7mLg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA5RZ0vMW+0_6FYtFEaN-NAnk1sT2ucCUDJe0-xKwZriROV--A@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CAA5RZ0sxPWP2xm8fxhscE+cUqC2VSFi9UZ9882BdGZ0MbGQNUA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK7ymc+0z7pL-Jub_52JDCyByxK3iYG7KHmudhsjgzF4WGmY0Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA5RZ0sUjsmCNTRHmpOpYNLJ0vbAMc00aJGtCeh6k3YKNw0LQQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK7ymc+Kr7i6p_6Hw_2hEg3xVRH8FYnnrEp0PHg+jeMvqH7mLg@mail.gmail.com>
> > I am not sure if this benchmark is enough to build confidence in this approach.
> > Workloads with nested queries and tack. 'all' are now paying an even heavier
> > cost.
>
> I would love to see and test sql that will reveal the bigger overhead.
> Do you have something specific on your mind? I'd love to share
> results, we can use them later considering further updates to pgss.
Here is something I was experimenting with today. I ran 2
benchmarks; one on HEAD and one with GetCurrentTimestamp()
added when we are accumulating stats.
"""
/* Increment the counts, except when jstate is not NULL */
if (!jstate)
{
Assert(kind == PGSS_PLAN || kind == PGSS_EXEC);
GetCurrentTimestamp();
"""
The benchmak script is a series of "SELECT;"
# select_tx.sql
"""
begin;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
select;
end;
"""
The benchmark was on my Ubuntu on EC2 c5a.12xlarge,
with default pg_stat_statements settings ( no plan tracking
and top tracking only ).
pgbench command:
```
pgbench -c48 -j16 -P1 -f select_tx.sql -T120
```
Results for 3 runs
## HEAD
tps = 29351.794589 (without initial connection time)
tps = 29470.287111 (without initial connection time)
tps = 29902.245458 (without initial connection time)
## with GetCurrentTimestamp()
tps = 28569.471891 (without initial connection time)
tps = 28013.051778 (without initial connection time)
tps = 28518.468843 (without initial connection time)
I see around 4-5% performance degradation.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
view thread (8+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add last_executed timestamp to pg_stat_statements
In-Reply-To: <CAA5RZ0tiUbG5RNK-Es+=R9RGpUkCBeJ_WQA5GzpAD3QiDgS3MA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox