public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nisha Moond <[email protected]>
To: Jim Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 13:57:58 +0530
Message-ID: <CABdArM4_=HZjkQAxy5OA2u0h+ZLCacQGNQREot8-nXJ2QNTgbA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAHut+PvSOmRrQX+VrFYHtFipV9hM=p99FeOwYCzkuU2BOaLu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAHut+Pturr_EY3WgVMT5+rrcKLm9HcRCk5X0WH8zvwtD2K2ixA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAHut+PvfAQQTaV4qQzivBx_LLhveA0h=ugy_MRRR+NjwndNPgg@mail.gmail.com>
<CABdArM6Ls0DRkqmpg5oDjwJhkrC9rvUQ9+y1jNmwRG+cq57cVQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 1:00 PM Jim Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Nisha
>
> On 20/05/2026 09:09, Nisha Moond wrote:
> > For the describePublications (\dRp+) case, should we add an (sversion
> >> = 150000) guard around the new change, since it accesses
> > pg_publication_namespace, which is only available in PG15 and above?
> > Thoughts?
>
>
> I considered that in my first review, but since PG14 will be EOL'd by
> the time PG20 is shipped, I thought it wouldn't be necessary.
>
Okay, that makes sense.
--
Thanks,
Nisha
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: PSQL - prevent describe listing tables that are already in listed schemas
In-Reply-To: <CABdArM4_=HZjkQAxy5OA2u0h+ZLCacQGNQREot8-nXJ2QNTgbA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox