public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: shveta malik <[email protected]>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 11:53:53 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJpy0uAqBi+GbNn2ngJ-A_Z905CD3ss896bqY2ACUjGiF1Gkng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJpy0uA-gJp=aoH+=1jYvU4mZYt4vJCe=cmNn50ZLGFUdjB34g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4eK1KZyjdn7oXS3d7qJU5ag9ss4xSk0Jkjsh5NOrRdkPkV1g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CALj2ACUvK7ShPyirAURWf62=qOQqu=NwnyL5CMfVjM5Ody7Oxw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CALj2ACWk5a-LfBPziAjjFA--syoUSD_4jY6dZyhU8g8XuD-i7g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1+46kJF3Z2Tv=xdkyy0nuurrS7RfzqvqY8bq1MF-JLM=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CALj2ACVKncd+JZR8BeXSgPO4akqic9kO99Z6pCfeXQKwmye2Og@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1JwJdsKMxczGO9tYgEzxp_L2=j0QTeDDk2Tx4-ipGSppw@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CALj2ACWuNHJ3qBMmmy6i1YA9V8JDRSaciL2bBM+72bRcqiBE2g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CALj2ACVUCo48FXWAcxC9LEV6P=xgd-8O=e9aPmTRUZvvH_L7Zw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1LjNB8jBgqLHtf+FKnd=SfMz3TXXs871p7KjG4VHnxafg@mail.gmail.com>
<CALj2ACXQmGx-L073=8CUSOk3hhe=HL_e6dveYeR9WJcEh+7jvg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1L_UP=ZjCj=+cGEauYXHC1icUEfx16p+B7qrAHZuCx5Ew@mail.gmail.com>
<CALj2ACU6tV0bh_MiFBYU7-VK2cj8Gas73htcQjoOv0uvSEG_HA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJpy0uA-gJp=aoH+=1jYvU4mZYt4vJCe=cmNn50ZLGFUdjB34g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 10:33 AM shveta malik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 3:06 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I've attached the v18 patch set here.
>
I have a question. Don't we allow creating subscriptions on an
existing slot with a non-null 'inactive_timeout' set where
'inactive_timeout' of the slot is retained even after subscription
creation?
I tried this:
===================
--On publisher, create slot with 120sec inactive_timeout:
SELECT * FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('logical_slot1',
'pgoutput', false, true, true, 120);
--On subscriber, create sub using logical_slot1
create subscription mysubnew1_1 connection 'dbname=newdb1
host=localhost user=shveta port=5433' publication mypubnew1_1 WITH
(failover = true, create_slot=false, slot_name='logical_slot1');
--Before creating sub, pg_replication_slots output:
slot_name | failover | synced | active | temp | conf |
lat | inactive_timeout
---------------+----------+--------+--------+------+------+----------------------------------+------------------
logical_slot1 | t | f | f | f | f | 2024-03-25
11:11:55.375736+05:30 | 120
--After creating sub pg_replication_slots output: (inactive_timeout is 0 now):
slot_name |failover | synced | active | temp | conf | | lat |
inactive_timeout
---------------+---------+--------+--------+------+------+-+-----+------------------
logical_slot1 |t | f | t | f | f | | |
0
===================
In CreateSubscription, we call 'walrcv_alter_slot()' /
'ReplicationSlotAlter()' when create_slot is false. This call ends up
setting active_timeout from 120sec to 0. Is it intentional?
thanks
Shveta
view thread (43+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
In-Reply-To: <CAJpy0uAqBi+GbNn2ngJ-A_Z905CD3ss896bqY2ACUjGiF1Gkng@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox