public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Naylor <[email protected]>
To: Tobias Bussmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Lukas Fittl <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakob Egger <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Broken build on macOS (Universal / Intel): cpuid instruction not available
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 17:04:15 +0700
Message-ID: <CANWCAZZNu5nLzeeNs8TyC6Xs4HKzHni=yeTqCH7_QNpktR2nMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAP53PkzLmeNUiNtcOyw62KkD7OzthdCbkwGTyAk+Lu3LKsmOcg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANWCAZa5TEmjLy0xtBjP9NyuVCJpCOpVkBSzw-fqmH8D9tFzDg@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>

On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 3:26 PM Tobias Bussmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Am 08.05.2026 um 05:48 schrieb John Naylor <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Jakob and Tobias, how far do you get with the attached, at least for
> > the target x86 case?
>
> thanks! I tried the patch and it fixes the universal build that broke with
> 16743db (and make check passes for both architectures). It remains to be

Great! I've pushed that fix.

> analysed how useful these universal builds are given the lack of
> optimisations for one of the architectures, but at least they are possible
> again, as they were previously.

Taking a quick look at the configure output you provided, certain
optimizations will be lacking on both architectures:

checking for _mm_crc32_u8 and _mm_crc32_u32... no
checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with CFLAGS=... no
checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with
CFLAGS=-march=armv8-a+crc+simd... no
checking for __crc32cb, __crc32ch, __crc32cw, and __crc32cd with
CFLAGS=-march=armv8-a+crc... no
...
checking which CRC-32C implementation to use... slicing-by-8

But compiler builtins seem to work:

checking for builtin __atomic int32 atomic operations... yes
checking for builtin __atomic int64 atomic operations... yes

--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services





view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Broken build on macOS (Universal / Intel): cpuid instruction not available
  In-Reply-To: <CANWCAZZNu5nLzeeNs8TyC6Xs4HKzHni=yeTqCH7_QNpktR2nMQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox