public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: John Naylor <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Oleg Tselebrovskiy <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 12:07:13 +0700
Message-ID: <CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK64mnd9NE+xE18shrf-SSx-iwMVof=2DJ2y9_fOkQ5E2Abc5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CANWCAZYZQw-nzTXbx3Bk332VtY9_D7ksDsuMZ0A-iDZ53yG7Ng@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mnfeWLBRbMfnOsag0vGTDnT84KJzpuei40nG0OHyw4SESw@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZa1b2rcvoK657SmcKwh2P2cgASQ1D-0JPj5d3LbfaAVgA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mneN20+sW5WhV+r7hMVo4Rd0z11B6=3L039rWMt1wK3nPg@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZZuS3sNgLRo8Z4AM=uY4zTmz=dH5D4Z9xV6K0CEuJ8Hdw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mnejn9AZMYz03e7HX8Uui35PihUuOy=b+iBG=YtRKx0Log@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZZ_0AQMk1HgHXHX+JaeBfy_4kzwHgTdqMptDA7zM+nm+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mnc6jbehHv5AHc84tVFRJg4zeMiFuvPX9xZkRpq0210MFA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZY940P3wGOQAZWMLQL4MQGGyOu7WBjBEcn_gqcrr+NvAw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mne_oWN9d4mf+0c_5-4Emb9kRXA-OC05OJ4F_1fVqpjzDA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZZcKYp+01u1QmkShfXVkUCCdxtJAgHT-61Vw0ALoWj47A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mne=Q_4VSpJ8f4RQB-yAThd4+i-BRYMvfdGOhvwJQdYoKQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CANWCAZYg2MVbYTaczNYNC2kaPodtfB8toUfE2Mhp9kut=2wzEA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAK64mnd9NE+xE18shrf-SSx-iwMVof=2DJ2y9_fOkQ5E2Abc5g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 8:58 AM Andrew Kim <[email protected]> wrote:
> The removal of the backend-side checksum_backend_lib stanza without an
> equivalent dependency path explains the CI breakage clearly,
> and your diagnosis makes sense, v10-0003 approach,
> splitting the body of checksum_block into a semi-private
> implementation header while preserving the externally visible
> interface,
> that makes sense to me
Glad to hear it.
> I’m supportive of using v10 as the basis for further discussion and iteration,
> cleaning up Meson dependency declarations so generated headers are
> properly ordered,
> refining the PG_CHECKSUM_INTERNAL usage if needed,
Great!
It sounds like you've found some issues to address? It's not clear.
--
John Naylor
Amazon Web Services
view thread (15+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations
In-Reply-To: <CANWCAZbjdFnBiUmrBQC5vFFy0Fnn4SJG4AkkzGpTFhovodJdYQ@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox