public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Shinya Kato <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 18:55:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAOzEurQZ1a+6d1K8b=+Ww1NFQVwAt9KSCQsBWXYBaPnYCenK3g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<ZtZn0-JVQuBUbpWw@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<ZtcsLnUSuALqEyE-@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<ZurvG45F3lQHLw4G@nathan>
<Zur4qqhABOXtZS8h@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:42 PM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE. Attached is
> > the remaining piece.
>
> And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204.
> --
> Michael
Hi,
Should we consider preventing tab completion for PARTITION BY
immediately after CREATE TABLE name (...)? Or is it fine to leave it
as is, given that it's syntactically correct?
--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center
view thread (20+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
In-Reply-To: <CAOzEurQZ1a+6d1K8b=+Ww1NFQVwAt9KSCQsBWXYBaPnYCenK3g@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox