public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Andrey M. Borodin <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers mailing list <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Sergey Prokhorenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Przemysław Sztoch <[email protected]>
Cc: David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
Cc: Mat Arye <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikolay Samokhvalov <[email protected]>
Cc: Junwang Zhao <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: UUID v7
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 11:10:37 +0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAEG8a3JUgkY3EMp393kJ+bcye8q=VHfQDTQz7Ci-moNVjhPLZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>
	<CAJ7c6TPOOpr-39CNz32oC_ruEAiqhPZ=PBe0OE+d-W4wjBabWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGECzQRYit62xO=HqX7kAf8tELjZTsYc0LQ1LStUsaKSPqJu_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<[email protected]>



> On 12 Mar 2024, at 10:53, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It does not strike me as a good idea to rush an implementation without
> a specification officially approved because there is always a risk of
> shipping something that's non-compliant into core.  But perhaps I am
> missing something on the RFC side?

Upthread one of document’s authors commented:

> On 14 Feb 2023, at 19:13, Kyzer Davis (kydavis) <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> The point is 99% of the work since adoption by the IETF has been ironing out 
> RFC4122's problems and nothing major related to UUIDv6/7/8 which are all in a 
> very good state.

And also


> On 22 Jan 2024, at 09:22, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> And many libraries are already including implementation of UUIDv7 – here are some examples:
> 
> - https://www.npmjs.com/package/uuidv7
> - https://crates.io/crates/uuidv7
> - https://github.com/google/uuid/pull/139

So at least reviewing patch and agreeing on chosen methods and constants makes sense.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

view thread (11+ messages)  latest in thread

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: UUID v7
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox