pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:50:29 -0700
Message-ID: <FD049D31-9231-4F87-BED9-9848FEE15374@enterprisedb.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <114189.1603417579@sss.pgh.pa.us >
References: <12ED3DA8-25F0-4B68-937D-D907CFBF08E7@enterprisedb.com >
<20200420194210.sevnpi4lyghoanxi@alap3.anarazel.de >
<23E60C3C-C20A-4508-84AC-E0CEA59E784A@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+TgmobAm8vB1MNQ1taO1et+HxTN8ULnQvEG+grNDqNQTBjbtA@mail.gmail.com >
<F845AC50-A479-43F3-ADFB-861A4D2AD287@enterprisedb.com >
<5F743835-3399-419C-8324-2D424237E999@enterprisedb.com >
<CAFiTN-syyHc3jZoou51v0SR8z0POoNfktqEO6MaGig4YS8mosA@mail.gmail.com >
<E6F4258A-B661-4F2C-8A35-278C9436930A@enterprisedb.com >
<CAFiTN-s-VX3DLfqv7OOo0zGCTOZ3xVU9UZ6GgzBZdJTPNnYFNg@mail.gmail.com >
<885D2EC9-7D06-4903-A17D-72C184A1E1C5@enterprisedb.com >
<CAFiTN-uYg_PiZ854=5R-D9skratapAHKhaDAG7fhJv-Vn5UhaQ@mail.gmail.com >
<5CC85F28-F210-47AC-8DA8-EC4E82AF3FD5@enterprisedb.com >
<CAFiTN-sP5iFJGERTq4a4OLTCzjZKhLC5P6_k2bxQKXnuvdmzGA@mail.gmail.com >
<CAFiTN-tTg0R5AHvXC1ro9XphroX1wUtc5t91hU_+7DeGTpE5VQ@mail.gmail.com >
<0C0349EB-DD85-4DA8-82C7-DF70AB714592@enterprisedb.com >
<BA6E870F-241C-4DDB-B92D-DB39E679C7D4@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+Tgm! ! ! ! ! ! ! obQUdfM2Q7WAR606RR2YehCZ5GHRKBc-VWfRj-1ZUKqDA@mail.gmail.com >
<C4A3E5AE-CBB2-4E3F-8BAE-29EE216762C2@enterprisedb.com >
<CAAJ_b96_Xr2a+D0j8xKbOnCzURcVQm0V2DS+T_pfc+wt3BpL8g@mail.gmail.com >
<9DF93B83-FE46-4EC4-A99D-77A60729FD2D@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+TgmoZT3kCOaKq6=m5wHGKh_9XQDbCC1LZXL6w_+NMB-n1+mw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAAJ_b94hsrF4x7UKQj03416fAEXJorUpZ9WhsZZjqgv-4+Wg9A@mail.gmail.com >
<50F6468F-5A5E-412A-86EC-DF24B549D733@enterprisedb.com >
<CAAJ_b94+A1Gk5r5sBYbYM2K5hH_gyp_o=+gwJuJhn5ZEm5_rqw@mail.gmail.com >
<CAAJ_b94Wh_7kM9JuJk7wnNsYSNPdSzz35cOEaE_ZRnPcqvupCg@mail.gmail.com >
<7D603B53-8078-4AF0-851B-803FF4416501@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+TgmoZbPtTgkQBGoco39uqKUWuv=0+TOkiNcCuqWWvUkJVuxQ@mail.gmail.com >
<A4C9E0AE-46BA-457F-A445-4527E5AA5E3C@enterprisedb.com >
<98265AA9-7BDC-4708-9348-CC1B173BBE1D@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+Tgmoam+pnGKhWS+RAYCk1eqjhbAPX7Vm69g1VF56xwyxXw+g@mail.gmail.com >
<209783.1603313248@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<77A60E99-6054-40FD-A5D6-769C287D4A0F@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+T! gm! oa! D5! K6! Uh! O2! zddxVCDY2TcR9wSLVurhQYAYpQ0VZPec0og@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmobGxdm8Tsxawt7LW-qigHRHxD+b17PC+ft9EE+6pMhC9w@mail.gmail.com >
<721BFA83-EA6F-463D-A9DF-CE78A318B73A@enterprisedb.com >
<2A7DA1A8-C4AA-43DF-A985-3CA52F4DC775@enterprisedb.com >
<CA+TgmoaAG0BVk4b6iOYNCeALQ+4DGLmCbqYXqumK1noGq8UpnA@mail.gmail.com >
<114189.1603417579@sss.pgh.pa.us >
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 6:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> I get
>> off = 7777, flags = 2, len = 3bbb
>> on a little-endian machine, and
>> off = 3bbb, flags = 2, len = 7777
>> on big-endian. It'd be less symmetric if the bytes weren't
>> all the same ...
>
> ... but given that this is the test value we are using, why
> don't both endiannesses whine about a non-maxalign'd offset?
> The code really shouldn't even be trying to follow these
> redirects, because we risk SIGBUS on picky architectures.
Ahh, crud. It's because
syswrite($fh, '\x77\x77\x77\x77', 500)
is wrong twice. The 500 was wrong, but the string there isn't the bit pattern we want -- it's just a string literal with backslashes and such. It should have been double-quoted.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
view thread (218+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <FD049D31-9231-4F87-BED9-9848FEE15374@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink: ../FD049D31-9231-4F87-BED9-9848FEE15374@enterprisedb.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/FD049D31-9231-4F87-BED9-9848FEE15374@enterprisedb.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, x4mmm@yandex-team.ru, sfrost@snowman.net, michael@paquier.xyz, sulamul@gmail.com, dilipbalaut@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
In-Reply-To: <FD049D31-9231-4F87-BED9-9848FEE15374@enterprisedb.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox