public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
To: Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <[email protected]>
Cc: Antonin Houska <[email protected]>
Cc: Wolfgang Walther <[email protected]>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 20:09:28 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYmi+mXoq9dUagnkXDgWa72QjCg8SdagBz_yGPUdh1Px0XD5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+n9DHS_xUatuuspdC8tjtaMzY8P11Y9y5Fz+2pjikkL9g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=2cArQoSSRdAYwx2TBSHL5r0UhX28Q-5TP=0g-sxBXCA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGECzQShbNtypPqabVv2eKJP=0Ejox=6f8k8G1E-2GN6Ag1kAA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+=j9nLQFjQ8z0vyQmuhNMwsFbzvne_2S2pTbBGir4q6EQ@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+k9uN2OQ_sXjztZYPSpPbfGmkkv4yhtPhyjNQ6vy7SSfA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=WA4ZfyHWt+4=yFV7VAXQWvNKsn4R=3PwLd4GfmSTiBA@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+=cs+gDTAH0L+3JzpRLeHPOXDQxu7MOfsbjah9SkAP_kw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOYmi+=UsSnLM4K+hYkhrezpQROQ5jr=72feAkQ0Te8GJf3Fbg@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<CAOYmi+mXoq9dUagnkXDgWa72QjCg8SdagBz_yGPUdh1Px0XD5g@mail.gmail.com>
> On 30 Apr 2025, at 19:59, Jacob Champion <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:55 AM Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Nitpick, but it won't be .so everywhere. Would this be clearar if spelled out
>> with something like "do not rely on libpq-int.h when building libpq-oauth as
>> dynamic shared lib"?
>
> I went with "do not rely on libpq-int.h in dynamic builds of
> libpq-oauth", since devs are hopefully going to be the only people who
> see it. I've also fixed up an errant #endif label right above it.
That's indeed better than my suggestion.
> I'd ideally like to get a working split in for beta.
+Many
> Barring
> objections, I plan to get this pushed tomorrow so that the buildfarm
> has time to highlight any corner cases well before the Saturday
> freeze.
I'll try to kick the tyres a bit more as well.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
view thread (198+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox