public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) <[email protected]>
Cc: Amit Kapila <[email protected]>
Cc: shveta malik <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Smith <[email protected]>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <[email protected]>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 06:24:36 +0000
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB57162D8A8AD7E1F6E52C90CF94D39@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB5866B73F090BA597263AAD08F5CF9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAA4eK1LGmZsevrqJra0V4O8oBU_eKyzm2VMpSAYQaDgC6n4fkA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAFiTN-uhnJkrUsQByBHMK268T-GEx_D8DQ6b2T+aW6RiU75pbQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB571621ED532C2D7C3E01625894FB9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFiTN-t5+_zTf86EzgCwObs1ED-P_5Ab1KMw340d3oPY_+Cwpw@mail.gmail.com>
<OS3PR01MB5718AE486227CE3ACB844C5E94F89@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAFiTN-sgQ-K9BnMWKLR7Hm36QNjS7ZOBF6hsXJmQz5ChC0Desw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1+P9WOFBupaTZCzYtranSH=8TSUYV=kk5xQJ-VNKnvgmQ@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB571685A645E509267AC5F30894F99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<OS0PR01MB57168A5A1C31BC316CB63D3C94F99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAA4eK1KK7Xty7SaCReY_b5moPURowMGOsfvhOb6xQ1EAaJAh6A@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB5716863B23DBAD186F64ADF194FF9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAHut+PvA10Bp9Jaw9OS2+puKHr7ry_xB3Tf2-bbv5gyxD5E_gw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1KYUbnthSPyo4VjnhMygB0c1DZtp0XC-V2-GSETQ743ww@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJpy0uC0JamKT6pTtux3NDhcqSMJnDoQXZxx32pq=2yyxQ1c5Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1KueUT_vr1cg43MpvRcaVvW03i6zDECQNAwFBK5PhXOVA@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB5716C663C85687E76672327094FD9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAHut+PuKYdA4047wATm8WpkkqQX2CPNCa++dSQKr6dD1O5nz_Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1LotEuPsteuJMNpixxTj6R4B8k93q-6ruRmDzCxKzMNpA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1JdDrFxcw20YHifFrfX1o_e=9sXpNMfNC5vMYvYcebwNg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD21AoAy2c=Mx=FTCs+EwUsf2kQL5MmU3N18X84k0EmCXntK4g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAA4eK1+EYODkcHTs1F6TmQdYeuT8WkzZGbnr8yAv5WfTFeV7-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB5716B68E724D9A321238483294C89@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAHut+Pvw0eBGu+pe9jRBdC+29MO5Fep4CTf92muhV5Ji+P9tcw@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB57167F14EED6B95582155D9194C99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<OS0PR01MB57168ADE4F156E1D65795ECF94C99@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAHut+Pu8LCtzdd_PMbUoueZ9W8D7-Hd6nTH30kFEGzhfTgtFEg@mail.gmail.com>
<OS0PR01MB57164C52100F6B68D2E3874194CE9@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<TYAPR01MB5866B73F090BA597263AAD08F5CF9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Thursday, January 26, 2023 11:37 AM Kuroda, Hayato/黒田 隼人 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Followings are comments.
Thanks for the comments.
> In this test the rollback-prepared seems not to be executed. This is because
> serializations are finished while handling PREPARE message and the final
> state of transaction does not affect that, right? I think it may be helpful
> to add a one line comment.
Yes, but I am slightly unsure if it would be helpful to add this as we only test basic
cases(mainly for code coverage) for partial serialization.
>
> 1. config.sgml
>
> ```
> + the changes till logical_decoding_work_mem is reached. It can also
> be
> ```
>
> I think it should be sandwiched by <varname>.
Added.
>
> 2. config.sgml
>
> ```
> + On the publisher side,
> <varname>logical_replication_mode</varname> allows
> + allows streaming or serializing changes immediately in logical
> decoding.
> ```
>
> Typo "allows allows" -> "allows"
Fixed.
> 3. test general
>
> You confirmed that the leader started to serialize changes, but did not ensure
> the endpoint.
> IIUC the parallel apply worker exits after applying serialized changes, and it is
> not tested yet.
> Can we add polling the log somewhere?
I checked other tests and didn't find some examples where we test the exit of
apply worker or table sync worker. And if the parallel apply worker doesn't stop in
this case, we will fail anyway when reusing this worker to handle the next
transaction because the queue is broken. So, I prefer to keep the tests short.
> 4. 015_stream.pl
>
> ```
> +is($result, qq(15000), 'all changes are replayed from file')
> ```
>
> The statement may be unclear because changes can be also replicated when
> streaming = on.
> How about: "parallel apply worker replayed all changes from file"?
Changed.
Best regards,
Hou zj
view thread (105+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
In-Reply-To: <OS0PR01MB57162D8A8AD7E1F6E52C90CF94D39@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox