From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 09:36:22 +0900
Message-ID: <X9lWho7MUmppfVO0@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201215190909.GK16415@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <X9hHoQcZ11pBtgnz@paquier.xyz>
<20201215031902.GB14596@momjian.us>
<20201215190909.GK16415@tamriel.snowman.net>
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:09:09PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Yeah, looking at what's been done there seems like the right approach to
> me as well, ideally we'd have one set of APIs that'll support all these
> use cases (not unlike what curl does..).
Ooh... This is interesting. What did curl do wrong here? It is
always good to hear from such past experiences.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, sfrost@snowman.net, bruce@momjian.us, masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for key managment
In-Reply-To: <X9lWho7MUmppfVO0@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox