pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedIncorrect include file order in guc-file.l
9+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
Commits from this thread:
2022-11-05 2a71de8915 Remove unneeded includes of <sys/stat.h>
2022-11-04 233cf6e8ad Remove outdated include
2022-11-03 062eef3a9b Straighten include order in guc-file.l
* Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
@ 2022-11-02 05:29 Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2022-11-02 05:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Hi all,
While reviewing a different patch, I have noticed that guc-file.l
includes sys/stat.h in the middle of the PG internal headers. The
usual practice is to have first postgres[_fe].h, followed by the
system headers and finally the internal headers. That's a nit, but
all the other files do that.
{be,fe}-secure-openssl.c include some exceptions though, as documented
there.
Thoughts?
--
Michael
Attachments:
gucfile-include.patch (text/x-diff, 489B) download
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc-file.l b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc-file.l
index 2436396306..caa9c902b9 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc-file.l
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc-file.l
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "postgres.h"
#include <ctype.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "common/file_utils.h"
@@ -17,7 +18,6 @@
#include "mb/pg_wchar.h"
#include "miscadmin.h"
#include "storage/fd.h"
-#include <sys/stat.h>
#include "utils/memutils.h"
}
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
@ 2022-11-02 06:01 ` Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 06:53 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Rouhaud @ 2022-11-02 06:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>; +Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:29:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> While reviewing a different patch, I have noticed that guc-file.l
> includes sys/stat.h in the middle of the PG internal headers. The
> usual practice is to have first postgres[_fe].h, followed by the
> system headers and finally the internal headers. That's a nit, but
> all the other files do that.
>
> {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c include some exceptions though, as documented
> there.
Agreed, it's apparently an oversight in dac048f71eb. +1 for the patch.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
@ 2022-11-02 06:53 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Naylor @ 2022-11-02 06:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; +Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:01 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:29:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > While reviewing a different patch, I have noticed that guc-file.l
> > includes sys/stat.h in the middle of the PG internal headers. The
> > usual practice is to have first postgres[_fe].h, followed by the
> > system headers and finally the internal headers. That's a nit, but
> > all the other files do that.
> >
> > {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c include some exceptions though, as documented
> > there.
>
> Agreed, it's apparently an oversight in dac048f71eb. +1 for the patch.
Yeah. +1, thanks.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
@ 2022-11-03 05:40 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Naylor @ 2022-11-03 05:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; +Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:01 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 02:29:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > While reviewing a different patch, I have noticed that guc-file.l
> > includes sys/stat.h in the middle of the PG internal headers. The
> > usual practice is to have first postgres[_fe].h, followed by the
> > system headers and finally the internal headers. That's a nit, but
> > all the other files do that.
> >
> > {be,fe}-secure-openssl.c include some exceptions though, as documented
> > there.
>
> Agreed, it's apparently an oversight in dac048f71eb. +1 for the patch.
I've pushed this, thanks!
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
@ 2022-11-03 11:40 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-03 12:19 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2022-11-03 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>; +Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:40:19PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:01 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Agreed, it's apparently an oversight in dac048f71eb. +1 for the patch.
>
> I've pushed this, thanks!
Thanks for the commit. I've wanted to get it done yesterday but life
took over faster than that. Before committing the change, there is
something I have noticed though: this header does not seem to be
necessary at all and it looks that there is nothing in guc-file.l that
needs it. Why did you add it in dac048f to begin with?
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
@ 2022-11-03 12:19 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 22:42 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Naylor @ 2022-11-03 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>; +Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 6:40 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 12:40:19PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 1:01 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> Agreed, it's apparently an oversight in dac048f71eb. +1 for the patch.
> >
> > I've pushed this, thanks!
>
> Thanks for the commit. I've wanted to get it done yesterday but life
> took over faster than that. Before committing the change, there is
> something I have noticed though: this header does not seem to be
> necessary at all and it looks that there is nothing in guc-file.l that
> needs it. Why did you add it in dac048f to begin with?
Because it wouldn't compile otherwise, obviously. :-)
I must have been working on it before bfb9dfd93720
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-03 12:19 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
@ 2022-11-03 22:42 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-04 00:55 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2022-11-03 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>; +Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 07:19:07PM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> Because it wouldn't compile otherwise, obviously. :-)
>
> I must have been working on it before bfb9dfd93720
Hehe, my fault then ;p
The CI is able to complete without it. Would you mind if it is
removed? If you don't want us to poke more at the bear, that's a nit
so leaving things as they are is also fine by me.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-03 12:19 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 22:42 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
@ 2022-11-04 00:55 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-05 03:34 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Naylor @ 2022-11-04 00:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>; +Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> The CI is able to complete without it. Would you mind if it is
> removed? If you don't want us to poke more at the bear, that's a nit
> so leaving things as they are is also fine by me.
I've removed it.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-03 12:19 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 22:42 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-04 00:55 ` Re: Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
@ 2022-11-05 03:34 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Michael Paquier @ 2022-11-05 03:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>; +Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>; Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 07:55:20AM +0700, John Naylor wrote:
> I've removed it.
Thanks.
Aha, there were three more of these, as of rewriteheap.c, copydir.c
and pgtz.c that I also forgot to clean up in bfb9dfd..
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-11-05 03:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-11-02 05:29 Incorrect include file order in guc-file.l Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-02 06:01 ` Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
2022-11-02 06:53 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 05:40 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 11:40 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-03 12:19 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-03 22:42 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
2022-11-04 00:55 ` John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
2022-11-05 03:34 ` Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox