From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 08:21:18 +0900
Message-ID: <ZKX67iJ2MxQVCgap@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230705212927.GA3518200@nathanxps13>
References: <20230630200509.GA2830328@nathanxps13>
<ZKJ2xwbI1onh5hHB@paquier.xyz>
<20230705212927.GA3518200@nathanxps13>
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 02:29:27PM -0700, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> },
> - {
> - {"db_user_namespace", PGC_SIGHUP, CONN_AUTH_AUTH,
> - gettext_noop("Enables per-database user names."),
> - NULL
> - },
> - &Db_user_namespace,
> - false,
> - NULL, NULL, NULL
> - },
> {
Removing the GUC from this table is kind of annoying. Cannot this be
handled like default_with_oids or ssl_renegotiation_limit to avoid any
kind of issues with the reload of dump files and the kind?
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, nathandbossart@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Should we remove db_user_namespace?
In-Reply-To: <ZKX67iJ2MxQVCgap@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox