public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
To: jian he <[email protected]>
Cc: Postgres hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:05:27 +0900
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACJufxENjwgKUuv_Na72W5OmYEq1ycZ5s7Rd8kXPk-XDK3sh6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
	<CACJufxENjwgKUuv_Na72W5OmYEq1ycZ5s7Rd8kXPk-XDK3sh6g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:10:26PM +0800, jian he wrote:
> why not just shovel these to standard_ProcessUtility.
> so ProcessUtility will looking consistent with (in format)
>  * ExecutorStart()
>  * ExecutorRun()
>  * ExecutorFinish()
>  * ExecutorEnd()

That's one of the points of the change: checking that only in
standard_ProcessUtility() may not be sufficient for utility hooks that
don't call standard_ProcessUtility(), so you'd stil want one in
ProcessUtility().
--
Michael


Attachments:

  [application/pgp-signature] signature.asc (833B, ../[email protected]/2-signature.asc)
  download

view thread (3+ messages)

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox